Search for: "U. S. v. Test"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 8:39 pm
[v]iolate any provision [of this section or] [b]e on duty or operate a commercial motor vehicle if, by the driver’s general appearance or conduct or by other substantiating evidence, the driver appears to have used alcohol within the preceding 4 hours. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm
Jones, 565 U. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
” 541 U. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
However, While discovery should be liberal, information sought must be material and necessary, and meet the test of usefulness and reason (Manley v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:37 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
Human Factors/Usability (HF/U) and Clinical Performance Testing The draft guidance offers general information about HF/U and clinical performance testing. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:05 pm
Following up on my earlier post about City of Ontario v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
DOJ’s position here would replace this time-tested contextual model with a rigid clear statement test. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Grussing v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:20 pm
The Minnesota Supreme Court held that police do not need a warrant to walk the dog to one’s front door and see if it passes the sniff test. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 6:21 am
, 534 U. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 12:01 am
But Wirt went back to Marshall in 1832 to argue Worcester v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
” The Court’s Lemon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
’s case, under the relevant Supreme Court decision, Tinker v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Deston Therapeutics LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:17 am
Using a global positioning device to track the location of individuals while at workPeople v Weaver, 2009 NY Slip Op 03762, Decided on May 12, 2009, Court of AppealsA number disciplinary actions taken against employees were initiated by, or relied upon, the use of global positioning equipment installed in the employer's vehicle or in the employer-issued cell phone. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:33 am
California, 573 U. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Kimmel & Silverman http://t.co/xTZNJmDBaG -> More on copyright in tattoos: a Belgian precedent http://t.co/oLGjP8iWNA -> Anti-Patent Bias in Applying Injunction Test Results in Reversal – Aria Diagnostics v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
The Fourth Circuit’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
