Search for: "U.S. v. King*" Results 501 - 520 of 4,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The doctrine applies only to legal determinations that were necessarily resolved on the merits in [a] prior decision” and “to the same questions presented in the same case” (Erickson, 98 AD3d at 717; Baldasano v Bank of N.Y., 199 AD2d 184, 185 [2d Dept 1993]; see also U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
– to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The U.S. is encouraging disposable devices. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
During her two years there, her clients included Shell Oil, which Kruger represented in an appeal to the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:43 am by Stephen Mayeaux
Brief on behalf the Count of Superunda, General Lieutenant and Viceroy of the Kingdom of Perú, versus the Fiscal Prosecutor of the War Council, concerning the defense and surrendering of the city of Havana to the British forces in the year of 1762. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]