Search for: "U.S. v. London" Results 501 - 520 of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Burkhard is licensed to practice law in Germany and is standing legal counsel to the German operation of the London-based Howden Broking Group. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
The signs of the impending seasonal change have truly begun to weave its signature signs into the patchwork quilt that has been the London summer. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
  The 2012 Olympics in London, initially budgeted at $4.6 billion (U.S. dollars), has nearly tripled in costs to a new estimate of $17.6 billion.[10]  The 2004 Olympics in Athens reached a total of $12 billion, while the final cost of Beijing's 2008 Games, first budgeted at $23 billion, is too speculative to predict.[11]      Chicago is not immune to cost overruns either. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:20 am by John Jascob
Regarding crypto, Grewal said that the SEC encourages the use of new technologies for capital formation, but that all securities sold to U.S. investors must comply with the U.S. securities laws. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
This Kat, being a hoary type, recalls the tumult that accompanied the 1986 decision by the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 9:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Be that as it may, the App Store Review Guidelines were provided to CADE by those two U.S. entities.The letter to which Apple's Brazilian counsel from the firm of Barbosa Müssnich Aragão attached the two versions of the App Store Review Guidelines comes with a ceterum censeo. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm by Levin Papantonio
The settlement will be paid out over 13 years.LPR was serving as co-lead trial counsel along with Gary Douglas of the Douglas & London law firm for the first bellwether case (City of Stuart, Florida v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am by William B. Gould IV
It was at that time that the preeminent scholar of U.S. labor law, William B. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm by Mike Aylward
RC2 that a policy that only insured foreign “occurrences” did not apply to U.S. claims for exposure to Chinese leaded toys. [read post]