Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION" Results 501 - 520 of 914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The panel was moderated by Stefano Barazza (University of South Wales and JIPLP Co-Editor).Gill Grassie reported on the recent decision in Cartier v BSkyB ([2016] EWCA Civ 658), a landmark judgment on intermediary injunctions in trade mark cases (see here). [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Canadian Privacy Law blog has a post entitled “Ontario Court of Appeal confirms online harassment conviction where threatening website was “about” the complainant but not a threat directed “to” the complainant”. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm by Afro Leo
Afro-IP is delighted to announce that this is the final guest post from Prof Wim Alberts. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:33 am
Italian Supreme Court confirms availability of copyright protection to TV formatsIn a recent the decision of RTI Reti Televisive Italiane Spa v Ruvido Produzioni Srl, decision 18633/17 (27 July 2017), the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that TV formats can be protected under the Italian Copyright Act (Legge 633/1941), and clarified at what conditions such protection is available. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
Written by Ekaterina Aristova, PhD in Law Candidate, University of Cambridge On 14 October 2017, the London’s Court of Appeal passed its long awaited decision in Lungowe v Vedanta confirming that foreign citizens can pursue in England legal claims against English-based multinationals for their overseas activities. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:19 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this post ran on July 24, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Jesner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
Devitt Distinguished Service to Justice Award. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
 UPDATE: Complainant against UPC ratification in Germany confirmed as Ingve StjernaIt has been confirmed that the complainant who filed the constitutional complaint against the ratification of the UPC Agreement in Germany was the attorney Ingve Stjerna. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In this respect the respondents submitted two questions of law and requested that if neither the case was remitted to the Opposition Division, nor the requested corrections were allowed, they be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.The following document, related to inventive step over the combination of the teachings of documents D1 and D2, was also submitted:R15: Saint Gobain v Fusion Provida Ltd, Case No: A3/2004/2441.VI. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
This post originally appeared on the Brett Wilson LLP Media Law Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Judge Carter also referred to a 2015 decision by the New York Court of Appeals in Universal American Corp. v. [read post]