Search for: "US v. Harri" Results 501 - 520 of 4,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
Harry Covington (D-Md)—the floor manager of the bill that became the FTC Act—assured his colleagues that Congress was not granting the FTC the power for legislative rulemaking. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
This Essay examines the surprisingly under-explored relationship between misdemeanor cash bail & pretrial detention and the Excessive Fines and Excessive Bail Clauses of the Eighth Amendment, using the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Timbs v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Shane Harris report for the Washington Post. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:47 pm by Frank Cranmer
The effect of the only leading case in that area – Harries v Church Commissioners for England [1992] 1 WLR 1241, aka the Bishop of Oxford case, which concerned the Church of England’s investment policy in relation to South Africa – was unclear [1]: there is a helpful note on Harries here. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The proceedings should have been brought in a Californian court in accordance with the defendant’s terms of use. [read post]
During the Federal Trade Commission’s April 28 open meeting, Commissioners utilized the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
” Vice President Kamala Harris criticized Beijing for undermining the rules-based order and threatening the sovereignty of other South China Sea nations. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Tell us a little about him and his influence on John. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm by Holly Brezee
To learn more about Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig and how we assist you, contact us by calling 800-747-9354 or emailing clientservices@dbllawyers.com. [1] Though rights to his songs are at issue in the case, Eminem is not a party to the current suit. [2] The suit also alleged counts of vicarious infringement and contributory infringement against the Harry Fox Agency, one count of which was recently dismissed.… [read post]