Search for: "US v. Jacobs"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
” See Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:22 am
Accordingly, the defendant's submissions in support of his motion for [*2]summary judgment did not establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff will be unable to prove the elements of legal malpractice and, thus, he failed to demonstrate his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650, 651; Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453, 454). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:54 pm
In light of how one can lose priority, the problem Novartis faced in seeking to establish that Claim 7 was entitled to priority from the US application was that disclosure of the US application was either too general or too narrow. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:26 pm
Jacobs, No. 142519, and vacated its June 22, 2011 order. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:24 pm
The message of the case for those who would want to bring a SLAPP is clear – you SLAPP us and the law will slap you back. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:59 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 pm
The traditional common law position, represented by cases such as National Trust v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
See 681 F. 3d, at 147 (Jacobs, C. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
Barry Friedman is the Jacob D. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm
Jacobs also raised issues of trial misconduct by the Oakland County Prosecutor, claiming that Kaluzny's failure to raise the issue below rendered Thompkins' legal representation constitutionally deficient.The intermediate appellate court disposed of Jacobs' argument on the suppression issue with the following ruling:Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
There have been times when it appeared that Lord Justice Jacob was its only proponent. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:46 am
In Samper v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
A friendly reminder: We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
Jacob, 2012 N.Y. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
The key to answering this question lies in paragraphs [116] to [119] of Lord Justice Jacob's judgment in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
The key to answering this question lies in paragraphs [116] to [119] of Lord Justice Jacob's judgment in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 5:12 pm
Johnson, 626 So.2d 338, 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Jacob v. [read post]
