Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 501 - 520 of 9,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
After the Supreme Court granted certiorari in 2016, it divided 4-4, thereby establishing no precedent but leaving the Fifth Circuit’s decision in place. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by David Lynn
Question 128D.21 – To comply with Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of Regulation S-K, the methodology used to compute the fair value amounts of all equity awards must be consistent with the methodology used to account for share-based payments in the financial statements under GAAP. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
As a result the court granted the deceased Georg Jensen a protection period of 65 years (marking the time from his death to the commercial use of his signature).While the Danish legal system surely recognizes the existence of postmortem image rights, the duration thereof is yet to be determined with greater certainty. [read post]
 This is consistent with how the issue was considered before the 2022 High Court decisions in CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1 and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2. 2. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Dan Farber
Raimondo, 45 F.4th 359 (2022) (Supreme Court granted cert. but not on this issue). [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am by Eleonora Rosati
Such an exercise makes absolutely no sense and completely ignores the principle that copyright does not exist to protect against the use by others of the content embodied in the work (Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by Evelyn Tsisin
Supreme Court has struck down cost considerations, such as Whitman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
This amounted to a good-faith effort to deal with the emergency and did not rise to the level of deliberate indifference. [read post]