Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens" Results 501 - 520 of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  But, in 2001, it was shut out, when the NFL’s 32 teams decided to solicit bids for an exclusive license to use those marks on headgear, and Reebok International Ltd., won the bidding contest, and got an exclusive license. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank Nessim and Stephen for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:21 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in Foster v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
 Former police officers Mark Dias and Stephen Matthews were awarded £3,000 each in compensation after their phone records were illegally obtained by Cleveland Police to find the source of leaks to journalists. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Jeffrey Kahn summarized the May 23 oral argument in Georgia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Sharp divisions marked previous cases in the area, several of which were decided without any single majority opinion. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
Three Justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Stephen G. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by John L. Welch
David Sams to Step Down November 1st Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability On This Section 2(d) Refusal Stephen W. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:40 am by INFORRM
The intervention was drafted by Mark Simpson QC and Jessica Simor, and for which MLDI acknowledges the assistance of Finers Stephens Innocent and Harvey Kass Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Reilly Stephens weigh in on Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:44 am
Justice Stephen's majority decision adopts an abuse of discretion standard for appellate review. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:39 am by Amy Howe
The 6-3 ruling in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
Tam’s ability to use The Slants mark in commerce, or otherwise engage in expression or debate on any subject he wishes. [read post]