Search for: "US v. Nixon" Results 501 - 520 of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
Nixon, and the protocol of congressional hearings. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:17 am by Marissa Miller
Justice Stevens strongly criticized the Court’s ruling earlier this year in Connick v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:50 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Justices Seem Skeptical of Vermont Law Restricting Use of Prescriber-Identifiable Data - Washington, DC lawyer Anna Kraus of Covington & Burling on the firm's blog, Inside Privacy Public Access Issues Under The Shoreline Management Act - Seattle attorney John Lenker of Mikkelborg Broz Wells Fryer on the firm's blog, Seattle Maritime Law Federal Circuit Provides New Rules for Post Injunction Contempt Proceedings in TiVo v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It's always a strange political culture that acquaints us with obscure constitutional provisions. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC attorney Angelle Smith of Covington on their blog, InsidePoliticalLaw Cross-Border Custody Disputes and the Application of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act – Denver lawyer Steven Johnston of Pryor Johnson Carney Karr Nixon on his blog, Colorado Family Law Matters More on Fail-Safe Classes and Structural Flaws- Northside Chiropractic Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:20 am
Another is the claim by President Nixon that he could order domestic surveillance. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
Then there are conservatives who worry about government seizure of private property said to have been used to facilitate crimes, an issue raised in Alvarez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
In 2011 OLC opined that “[t]he President had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force in Libya because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Weissmann
This new test is a bastardization of a test from a Supreme Court civil immunity case that did require balancing (in that case, Nixon v. [read post]