Search for: "US v. Robert Barnes"
Results 501 - 520
of 584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
Barnes said that approving the purchase would expose the Dakota to “unacceptable financial risk. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
Yesterday, Robert Barnes and Amy Goldstein at the Washington Post and Joan Biskupic at USA Today reported on the conclusion of Kagan’s remarks. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post (subscription required). [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
Laura & Dennis Brown, et al, an 8-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:The parties' arguments require us to interpret Indiana Code section 28-9-4-2. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/yNE968 (Robert Hilson) Improving Collaboration Between Inside and Outside Counsel in E-Discovery - bit.ly/yMgmik (@eDiscoveryBeat) In Civil Litigation, 'Private' Social Media Data Isn't Private - bit.ly/zN4TEq (Aaron Crews) In 'U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
Other previews come from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Richard Wolf of USA Today (who has another preview here), Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, and Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Additional coverage comes from Ann Flaherty at the Associated Press, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily, here and here, Amanda Reilly at E&E News, Ariel Wittenberg, also at E&E News, an NPR Politics podcast, Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily, and David Lat at Above the Law. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am
” Briefly: Robert Barnes of the Washington Post previews Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am
” Peter Wallsten and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Brooks Jackson of FactCheck.org (via USA Today), and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have coverage of the President’s remarks, while Sandy Levinson has commentary at Balkinization. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he court’s announcement offered no further detail but seems to leave much leeway, including whether the justices would hold some hearings by teleconference or other method. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am
” I covered the statement for this blog, with other coverage coming from Pete Williams and Halimah Abdullah of NBC News, Michael Shear of The New York Times, Jessica Taylor and Meg Anderson of NPR, Priscilla Alvarez of The Atlantic, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, and Harper Neidig of The Hill. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that Kavanaugh’s speech “celebrat[ing] his ‘first judicial hero,’ the late Chief Justice William H. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “Francisco, 50, who was confirmed in September 2017, has defended some of the administration’s most controversial cases at the Supreme Court, most notably Trump’s ban on travelers from certain mostly Muslim countries. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
" (Mossoff, at 5) (quoting NGS American, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Kirsch, Robb and Barnes. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:11 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “those who know Gorsuch and have studied his decade of solidly conservative opinions on the U.S. [read post]
