Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 501 - 520
of 9,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 8:23 pm
Smith 16-1067 Issue: Whether the parenthetical phrase “not to exceed 25 percent,” as used in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] upheld [opinion, PDF] several provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) [text, PDF] on Monday. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 10:43 am
The US Supreme Court ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Wednesday in Murphy v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:53 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Monday granted certiorari [order list, PDF] in Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:23 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 6:15 am
The press release mentions Microsoft’s highly visible encounter with ADR in the context of the US v Microsoft antitrust litigation. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 11:32 am
Chief DJ William Smith It would be unfair to expect a Judge who uses Twitter, has Dylan and Wilco on his iPad playlist, and who penned a 70+ page swipe at the crack guidelines, to necessarily write a great decision on constructive amendments. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:41 pm
In Berghuis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 10:20 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court handed down a decision Wednesday morning in Smith v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:57 pm
" Rather, under the rationale the Smith Court used to preserve the holdings in the unemployment compensation cases, the Commission would have to employ a Sherbert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:45 pm
By way of comparison, there 57 Smith cases in Cal.App.4th--but no two are adjacent! [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:36 pm
Defendant admitted that he had intended to use the $1,300 to purchase a quarter-pound of methamphetamine. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:09 pm
Smith was drawn to replace him. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:14 pm
Smith). [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
How to Use: Judge N.R. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
Wednesday’s other grants included: Chiaverini v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
Miller, a pedestrian decision relating to information everyone knew was in the hands of third parties, rather than the outcome-dependent decision in Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
The third-party doctrine comes from a 1979 Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
