Search for: "US v. Spencer"
Results 501 - 520
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 7:27 am
In PDS Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 5:01 pm
" The leading case in Pennsylvania on the enforceability of pre-nuptial agreements is Simeone v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:53 am
In last month’s case (Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
See American Bar Association v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Robert Keith Spencer, No. 10-0750 (DB). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:05 am
The '362 patent has non-patent references, including -->Data Bases Why They're Finally Usable, Joanne Kelleher, pp. 80, 83, 85, 87, Personal Computing, Oct. 1986. .Paradox 1.1, Rusel DeMaria, Byte, V.11, Sep. 1986, pp. 303, 306, 308. .R:Base Gets a Lot Better, Personal Computing V. 12, May 1988 pp. 222-224, Marvin Bryan. .And Now dBase IV, Miriam Liskin, Personal Computing, V.12 pp. 104-110, May 1988. .Advanced Features from New R:Base (System V),… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 11:53 am
In a filing on Tuesday, the justices denied certiorari in Bahlul v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm
” People v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Surveillance The Guardian had a piece “How Apple’s AirTag turns us into unwitting spies in a vast surveillance network”. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
BBC News has posted an article seeking to demystify the ways in which large technology companies use harvested personal data. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
[edited to add link to case] In a 3-2 en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
CPLR 306-b authorizes an extension of time for service in two discrete situations: "upon good cause shown" or "in the interest of justice" (Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 104-106 [2001]). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:39 am
http://tinyurl.com/2fwrnjl (Ralph Losey) Legal Hold Guidelines for every Legal Department - http://tinyurl.com/37c9cww (Heidi Maher) Preventing Employees from Hoarding Electronic Documents - http://tinyurl.com/35wtj6d (Mark Diamond) Ruling on Cell Phone Tower Data Raises Privacy Issues - http://tinyurl.com/2aazkvw (Leonard Deutchman) Safely Storing Confidential Customer Data in the Cloud - http://tinyurl.com/2ffgat4 (Dinsmore & Shohl) Spencer on Pre-Litigation Preservation &… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
"] From Spencer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:37 pm
Two recent cases that caught my attention: - US v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On 9 February 2024, there was a hearing in The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Dr Robert Milton & Amy Louise Spencer KB-2023-004745. [read post]
