Search for: "USA V RICHARD"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
In Gelboim v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that, in anticipation of a ruling striking down the bans, same-sex couples who can’t get married in their home states are nonetheless going ahead and planning weddings. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that Kavanaugh’s appearance at the ceremony “follows a whirlwind weekend in which he was confirmed by the Senate, sworn in, hired law clerks and assembled his high court chambers. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
Finally Rachel Buker (Art & Artifice blogger and Intellectual Property Attorney at Ironmark Law Group, PLLC) gave her view that infringement would not have been foun,d had the Red Bus case been heard in the USA. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am
Oracle USA Inc. and Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Joe Kernan urges the Court to grant review in Davis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Mark Sherman at AP, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, and Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, who reports that “several justices were concerned that there was no obvious formula for determining when a fine was excessive. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
News), Richard Wolf of USA Today, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Bob Barnes and Amber Phillips of The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
” Additional coverage comes from Bill Mears at Fox News, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, and Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that “[a]fter an hour’s debate in court, it appeared possible the justices could rule McKinney deserves a new trial court sentencing to assess mitigating factors such as his childhood abuse, but not before a jury. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
In Husted v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Death penalty USA, 2001-2002 (2009) and Death penalty USA 2003 - 2004 (2008) and Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 (2008). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in Benisek v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will consider whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that in a term full of high-profile cases, “it is the justices’ third date with same-sex marriage that’s dominating the docket. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
” Briefly: Richard Wolf reports at USA Today that “President Donald Trump’s three-year crackdown on immigration has led to a surge in lawsuits reaching the Supreme Court, where a rebuilt conservative majority increasingly is paying dividends for him. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf concludes that the Court’s four more liberal Justices “hijacked the Supreme Court this year – and already their conservative colleagues appear to be plotting revenge. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
In Venezuela v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
The Parkers alleged that they are the sole beneficiaries of the Richard Parker Family Trust (the "trust"), created under the will of their father, Richard Joseph Parker, who is deceased, and intended for their "education, care, support, and maintenance" until they reached the age of 35. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
