Search for: "USA v. Boards" Results 501 - 520 of 1,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf contrasts Benisek with Gill v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/ USA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:13 pm by Thomas Long
Although the Board erred in its analysis by declining to apply a prosecution disclaimer limiting the patent’s claims such that they excluded those of a prior art patent, the court affirmed the Board’s determination based on its alternative holding that, even if the prosecution history disclaimer were accepted, the claims at issue still were unpatentable for obviousness (Arendi S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the plaintiff in Tuesday’s second case, Lozman v. [read post]
The 5th Circuit struck down a similarly overbroad no-recording policy in T-Mobile USA Inc. v. [read post]