Search for: "Union Pacific Railroad"
Results 501 - 519
of 519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Purnell Museum files EEOC charge; says discharge was connected to discrim because of medical conditionDCNEWSCouncilwoman sponsoring bill to allow interns to sue for harass/discrimFLNEWSPalm Beach Cnty Schools investigates Black Asst Supt's claim of race discrimGAFILED[12-15] Sole fem Sanitation Dept truck driver sues Atlantic City for sex harassIDSETTLEDCoeur d'Alene Paving Inc pays $60K to settle EEOC suit alleging 3 Black employees were repeatedly subjected to racial slurs and jokes by a… [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Southern Pacific Railroad Company, el Tribunal Supremo federal había manifestado que las corporaciones son personas para propósitos de la Enmienda 14 de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos y merecen las mismas protecciones. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Maynard; Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
International Brotherhood of Teamsters (08-1214) Argued: Jan. 19, 2010 Issue: Whether a federal court has jurisdiction to determine collective bargaining agreement formation and whether a §301(a) action is available against a union that is not a direct signatory to the collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Ok, we've worried about what might happen if our side (the defense, for any new readers) were to lose the preemption wars currently in progress before the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
Despite our hardships, our union is strong. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
Union Pacific Railroad), but the Court does not question that they are persons in a legal sense. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am
During a divorce there may be a need for an expert to testify as to the value of a marital asset or the psychological make-up of a parent and child. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
Judges decide matters in an Illinois divorce. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 50 S.W.3d 226, 249 (Mo. 2001); Lopez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
I am happy to announce the publication of "The Human Rights Obligations of Stet-Owned Enterprises: Emerging Conceptual Structure and Principles in National and International Law and Policy," which appears in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational law 50(4):827-888 (2017). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Originally Published October 14, 2009 Introduction Nowadays, background checks of prospective employees are the rule, not the exception. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, and held that the Federal Power Act preempted state court review of the licensing project. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
It has been a little over two years since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bauman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Committee’s secret meetings became public after a clerk’s journal was discovered.26Members of the committee offered draft constitutional amendments for an up or down vote.27Rather than citing the Bill of Rights, the first drafts mirrored language in the recently passed Civil Rights Act of 1866.28 Subsequent drafts spoke in terms of individual and equal rights, giving Congress the power to “make all laws necessary and proper to secure to all persons in every state within the… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:34 pm
.: CSIS will host a webinar examining the Quad’s strategic approach to China, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Under the settlement, the railroad will pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, which included the discharge of tons of chlorine from a derailed train tank car and thousands of gallons of diesel fuel from ruptured locomotive engine fuel tanks. [read post]
