Search for: "United States Court of Federal Claims et al"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2019, 5:27 pm
The Board’s Determination The Board had determined that the ’221 Patent claims were obvious in view US Patent No. 5,474,498 (Schnur), in view of Gibbs et al. (2000) “Anticancer Drug Targets: Growth Factors and Growth Factor Signaling”, 105 J. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:41 am
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was denied in this case on 10/7/19: Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:04 am
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was denied in this case on 10/7/19: Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Weinstein et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
KLA-Tencor Corp., No. 19-58 (Federal Circuit jurisdiction over Walker Process antitrust claims) Senju Pharma. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
EEOC, et al., involves claims of discrimination based on transgender status. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:14 pm
In some states, and in federal court, the prosecution must move to dismiss and obtain the court’s approval. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Windy City Innovations, LLC, Nos. 2018-1400 et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Equifax Information Services LLC et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – September 18th, 2019) involves a credit history report. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:57 pm
Ocwen Financial Corporation, et al. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Kiser et al, 2019 WL 4017033, at *7 (S.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:22 am
Facts: This case (Tucker et al V. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:51 am
Facts: This case (Gordon et al v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Avanci et al. in San Jose and the German Nokia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:16 am
The state then brought the case to the North Carolina Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:54 am
United States, No. 19-308C, et al. [read post]
