Search for: "United States of America v. Bush"
Results 501 - 520
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2007, 7:22 pm
United States District Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:04 pm
United States District Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:38 pm
Bush case in the Northern District of California, more or less stating that the 105B procedures are required. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:47 am
The justices have already ruled in Rasul v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:50 am
Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
Given, however, that racism in the United States was largely cured by the Great Society, courts must adopt several principles when examining racial issues. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:31 am
This morning, we visited the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (a think tank of sorts for the German Parliament), where I asked the head of the Americas Unit if he expected any material changes in U.S. foreign policy after the next presidential election. [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:40 pm
Where would Falwell, Robertson and Dobson be without 1973's Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
It includes not only active participants in hostilities but also anyone who "purposefully and materially" supported attacks on the United States or its allies -- language that arguably encompasses anyone who sent money to a banned group or food to a combatant son. [read post]
12 May 2007, 5:07 pm
School Dist. v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
In his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
In his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:37 am
Jackson was our first imperial president and fashioned precedents that still structure separation of powers struggles in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
In Credit Suisse v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
Bush in 2004). [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Bush (233 F. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Hannity that a ban signed into law by President Bush in 2003, which the Supreme Court is reviewing, should be upheld.... [read post]
