Search for: "United States v. Barnes"
Results 501 - 520
of 858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
App. 653, 655 (1948); Barnes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
According to the Justice Department, the settlement is within the reaches of the public interest and provides effective and appropriate remedies for the antitrust violations alleged in the complaint, with respect to the settling defendants.On April 11, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division filed a complaint against Apple, Inc. and five of the six largest publishers in the United States for conspiring to fix the sales prices of electronic books or e-books. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Chelsea Phipps discusses the prospect that the government may have a more difficult time regulating false or misleading commercial speech in the wake of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
The Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
” - Alexander Keyssar, author of The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States Reviews “Hasen’s timely and factually rich account merits attention from jurists, policy specialists, and government reformers of all political stripes. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cruikshank, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1519 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Activa DPS Europe SARL v Pressure Seal Solutions Ltd (t/a Welltec Systems UK) [2012] EWCA Civ 943 (11 July 2012) Leach v The Office of Communications (OFCOM) [2012] EWCA Civ 959 (13 July 2012) SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 940 (13 July 2012) Berent v Family Mosaic Housing & Anor… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions: United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
“In light of the appellant's status not simply as a parolee generally but as a parolee for whom a parole retake arrest warrant was outstanding, we hold, pursuant to the balancing test of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
Though the United States District Court in South Carolina determined that Allstate breached the insurance contract, the Court reached a very different decision on the bad faith claim. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:23 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
United States. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm
United States, 655 F.3d 1124, 1132-34 (9th Cir. 2011)). [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Capato, in which the Court unanimously held that children conceived after their father’s death qualify for Social Security survivors benefits only if state intestacy law permits them to inherit from their father; Robert Barnes of the Washington Post also covers the case. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
In Holder v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:31 am
This article by the Washington Post's Robert Barnes poses the question whether "anything [has] changed in the world of campaign finance that might give pause to the five members of the Supreme Court who decided Citizens United v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:14 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
