Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 501 - 520
of 847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2008, 10:42 am
Lewis, 424 F.3d 239, 247 (2d Cir. 2005), thus "seriously affect[ing] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings," United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 2:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:45 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
Of course, given departures and Booker variances, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 1:40 pm
§ 3553(a) which tend to favor the government pursuant to Booker, Section 3553(a) mitigating factors which tend to favor the defendant apparently do not have to be considered, as shown by the Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:15 pm
This case was first before the court in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:21 am
Here is the first paragraph of the opinion to whet Booker reasonableness appetites:This is an appeal by the United States from judgments, which were entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, convicting the defendants Brian Williams and Samuel Shuler on their pleas of guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute crack cocaine. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
United States, 127 S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005); Apprendi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
Ct. 586, 597 (2007); and United States v. [read post]
