Search for: "United States v. Born" Results 501 - 520 of 3,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2021, 8:03 am by Ekow Yankah
United States – which the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday in the final argument of its 2020-21 term – packs so many swirling issues of great importance into an absurdly little case, it can hardly be believed. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am by Jan von Hein
Secondly, by examining more briefly the significance for the EU and its Member States of the change in the UK’s status from Member State to third country. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 9:30 am by Steve Gottlieb
One of my fellow students at law school was Drew Days, who became the first African-American head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and later Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
California, 220153Issue: Whether California’s sanctions against Texas and Texans – prohibiting state-funded or state-sponsored travel to Texas because Texas protects the religious freedom of faith-based child welfare providers within its borders – are born of religious animus and violate the Constitution’s privileges and immunities clause, interstate commerce clause and guarantee of equal protection. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:08 am
In 1923, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Mayela Celis
The latter provision states that jurisdiction over parental responsibility issues should be transferred to the courts where the child has acquired a new habitual residence and one of the alternative conditions set out in the said provision is satisfied (SS v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
United States decision—the first use of the word in a Supreme Court opinion. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
For minors, however, the legal landscape is more complicated, and they face unique barriers to access such as the lack of transportation or money and the inability to sneak away for medical appointments undetected by a disapproving parent.In Carey v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
By communication dated 18 May 2020 the Board informed the parties that the oral proceedings had been rescheduled for 8 February 2021.V. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:00 am by Jason Rantanen
This language came dangerously close to swallowing an industry extolled for democratizing science and helping the United States overcome its PPE shortage in the heart of the COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]