Search for: "United States v. Common" Results 501 - 520 of 15,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
Respondents registering common words that spell the name of a business or charitable entity state a good defense only if they use the domain names in the generic sense of the words and are not competitors. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:26 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Lower courts have applied a federal common law test based on the Bancec case (First National City Bank v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As the United States is a party to these instruments, it must address the activities of vulture funds that violate the rights enshrined in them. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:14 am by Gene Quinn
It is a ridiculous decision that lacks intellectual honesty and defies common sense. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Comment It has, in recent years, become increasingly common for libel actions to have the issue of meaning determined as a trial of a preliminary issue, see for example, within the last few months, HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz A Saud v Forbes [2014] EWHC 3823 and Hamaizia and another v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3408 This can be a useful way of clarifying the issues between the parties and assisting the… [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:44 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, August 5, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit More Bog Entries: Social Security Disability Judges Allegedly Used Racial and Sexual Terms on Claimants’ Applications, July 22, 2016, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Boyd v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
David Waite On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court unanimously rejected the efforts of certain states and environmental groups to declare power company emitters of carbon dioxide a "public nuisance" under federal common law. [read post]