Search for: "United States v. Connors"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Kennedy, French, O’Neill, and Fischer No: Justices O’Donnell and DeWine Key Precedent Fourteenth Amendment (“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit’s 2010 opinion in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:02 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jennifer Daskal explains why the court’s recent decision to review digital-privacy case United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:25 am
United States (1992), Justice Sandra Day O’Connor found that a federal waste-management law "would 'commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 10:48 am
The United States Supreme Court is trying to understand how that happened. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Van Orden v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
The State and the Free Times covered Alito’s speech. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
In the case of Clark v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:45 pm
Connor, the Supreme Court of the United States mandated the application of an “objective reasonableness” standard when evaluating claims that government agents (police) used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
Now Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit has written a concurrence in a decision, United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
We ran into related issues during the pre-Obergefell litigation on marriage equality, when the United States Attorney General and some State Attorneys General declined to defend the constitutionality of marriage and marriage-related laws that were discriminatory, and other parties (generally representatives of legislative factions and state or local officials) stepped in to do so, with fairly limited success. [read post]
