Search for: "United States v. Detente"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
§ 1225(b)(l)(B)(ii), a subsection of the federal statute governing the inspection and detention of immigrants who are considered “applicants for admission” to the United States, at the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
See Bader v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
United States District Judge James S. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
If the court revokes the preliminary injunction, he says, what happens if Doe is then transferred and seeks to return to the United States? [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In the Federal Tort Claims Act, Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States (and thus created the possibility of damages) for the "negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
Nor will it do to say that the detention was a necessary part of the process of evacuation, and so we are here concerned only with the validity of the latter. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
Nor will it do to say that the detention was a necessary part of the process of evacuation, and so we are here concerned only with the validity of the latter. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
Nor will it do to say that the detention was a necessary part of the process of evacuation, and so we are here concerned only with the validity of the latter. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:22 am
A few months ago, the Court of Appeals said that a man could sue the United States Attorney General for constitutional violations resulting from his restrictive detention on account of his ethnic background. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:02 pm
Guantanamo was chosen by the Bush administration in the belief that the writ of habeas corpus could not reach outside the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The court took note of the pending United States Supreme Court review in Ex Parte Medellin (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) 223 S.W.3d 315, cert. granted Apr. 30, 2007, sub nom. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:54 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:40 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
In the end, Doe v. [read post]
