Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 501 - 520 of 34,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm by Danielle Levine
Clowney, Civil Action No. 18-11947 (FLW)(ZNQ), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted defendant, Cato Clowney’s Motion to Set Aside Default in a personal injury case arising from a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm by Danielle Levine
Clowney, Civil Action No. 18-11947 (FLW)(ZNQ), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted defendant, Cato Clowney’s Motion to Set Aside Default in a personal injury case arising from a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Secretary, Department of Corrections, United States District Judge Mary Scriven granted a writ of habeas corpus filed by James Guzman because the state failed to disclose a witness had been paid. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Iron Maiden Holdings Ltd. v. 3D Realms Entertainment ApS Complaint Filed May 28, 2019 United States District Court Central District of California 3D Realms has now responded to the suit, […] [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 4:30 pm by Adam Lamparello
President and Fellows of Harvard College, the plaintiff, an organization that opposes affirmative action, filed suit against Harvard University in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleging... [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am by MBettman
 But the Supreme Court of Ohio found the reasoning in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Cir. 2007, 07-1017), non-precedential Parker  appealed a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissing his patent infringement action against Microsoft Corporation as frivolous. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]