Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 501 - 520
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
Although Rio Tinto has operations in many countries, including the United States, and Sarei lived in the United States as a resident alien when the complaint was filed, nothing done by Americans or in America, is at issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
The Court’s order directs the parties to file supplemental briefs on whether the ATS “allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
It seems that the rationale for the statute when it was passed was to provide a remedy for aliens, usually ambassadors, who were the victims of tortuous activity within the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm
Related posts: Another ATS Case Seeking Supreme Court Review New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed United States Supreme Court to Again Consider the Alien Tort Statute [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
In addition, there is a strong chance that the Court next Term could be reexamining its controversial ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:06 am
It reads, simply: The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:59 pm
What business does a case like that have in the courts of the United States? [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, which, as posted, "presents the question of whether corporations can be sued for torts 'committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States'" pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am
Bolchos v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
Today the Supreme Court is hearing oral argument in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (and a companion case) – one of the more important and interesting cases involving international law and foreign relations law of the United States in recent years. [read post]
