Search for: "United States v. Fisher"
Results 501 - 520
of 935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
United States, 11-5842, Fisher v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Sidhu raises two concerns with the “critical mass” argument invoked to justify the affirmative action program under challenge in Fisher v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:18 pm
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
In the most recent high-profile affirmative action case, Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
Writing at Washington Monthly, Daniel Luzer discusses Fisher v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
First, it is focused quite directly on the law in action, suggesting that the true functional law is Lynch’s rather than that of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
Thomas Fisher argues for the state of Indiana. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
United States, in which the Justices will hear arguments next Monday. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:34 am
Fisher in 1871, the United States Supreme Court has granted judges broad absolute immunity for all acts they have taken within their jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
” At KLRU, a documentary discusses affirmative action and Fisher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:30 pm
State v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Jannis Fisher, et al [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s mistress could not be prosecuted in federal court. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
