Search for: "United States v. Goldstein" Results 501 - 520 of 1,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am by Maureen Johnston
In re Ryan 14-375Issue: Whether this Court should issue a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition ordering the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to issue the mandate in Henry v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm by Kalvis Golde
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel for the respondent in Kansas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At ReligiousLiberty.TV, Michael Peabody notes that “[t]he Solicitor General … has recommended that the United States Supreme Court agree to consider [Patterson v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
” At this blog, Alan Horowitz analyzes last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 1:26 pm by Alexandra Gutierrez
In that capacity, he will represent the United States before the Supreme Court for the next few months. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America 13-449Issue: (1) Whether the First Amendment permits civil courts to retroactively impose a “trust” on church property based on church canons that were never embodied in any secular instrument of property ownership and did not comply with state law at the time of their adoption; (2) whether the Contracts Clause permits civil courts resolving church property disputes to apply changes to… [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by John Elwood
United States, 09-10246 (held since 9/27/10 for Freeman) Smith v. [read post]