Search for: "United States v. Jacobs" Results 501 - 520 of 932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, the case of an Iowa man who sold heroin to another individual, who then died. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:56 pm
For an interesting discussion of the issue, which expresses some sympathy to those who warn their family members, see United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, on which Lyle Denniston reported for this blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am by Ross Davies
Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States, 122 Yale Law Journal 522 (2012) • Diane P. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:44 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen reports on today’s dismissal of Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a forum-selection case, and United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
Argentina, while Robert Barnes of The Washington Post previews Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
  [This is substantially changed - previously stated (at "sixthly") there are no grounds for presuming that duplication of proceedings would be, without further reason, grounds for a stay.] [read post]