Search for: "United States v. Matthews" Results 501 - 520 of 1,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, which challenges gender-based residency requirements for transmitting U.S. citizenship. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:40 am by Matthew B. Kaplan
Voluntariness is a key issue in these cases because the United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:40 am by Matthew B. Kaplan
Voluntariness is a key issue in these cases because the United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am by John Floyd
THE POLICE AND FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE   The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the police from fabricating evidence; that the courts still have to remind law enforcement of this basic premise speaks volumes about how intrinsic corruption is in policing throughout the country. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am by Matthew B. Kaplan
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am by Matthew B. Kaplan
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 8:57 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
In 2021, a Ninth Circuit three-justice panel held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) didn’t preempt AB 51, and thus California could enforce its prohibition on mandatory employment arbitration agreements (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]