Search for: "United States v. Muslim" Results 501 - 520 of 1,433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm by EEM
Publications:The Application of the “One Central Reason” Standard in Asylum and Withholding of Removal Cases (Congressional Research Service, Dec. 2017) [text]Border Patrol Termination Rates: Discipline and Performance Problems Signal Need for Reform, Policy Analysis, no. 825 (Cato Institute, Nov. 2017) [text]"Middle Eastern and North African Immigrants in the United States," Migration Information Source, 10 Jan. 2018 [text]"MS-13 as a Terrorist… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Ashley Deeks
How will the United States react, if at all, when those states begin to employ China’s techniques? [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Harleen Gambhir
Department of State, and Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 212172 (SD NY, Dec. 27, 2017), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that during Ramadan, his medications were delivered during fasting hours.In United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am by Steve Lubet
  President Trump recently retweeted three inflammatory anti-Muslim videos. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 5:07 pm
United States, 323 U.S. 214, 242 (Murphy, J., dissenting). [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am by Sital Kalantry
About the Authors: Sital Kalantry is a clinical professor of law at Cornell Law School and author of Women’s Human Rights and Migration: Sex-Selective Abortion Law in the United States and India (2017). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
He argued that while there may be legal limits on presidential power to ban noncitizens from the United States, the courts should still defer to the executive branch, taking Donald Trump’s word for it that he is no longer intent on banning Muslims from the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:07 pm by Kevin
XVII, § 4 violate the First Amendment and the Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
It will separate Muslims in the United States from their family members abroad. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am by Scott R. Anderson, Yishai Schwartz
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am by Vanessa Sauter
Yishai Schwartz provided an update on military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]