Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 501 - 520
of 23,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
" Mota v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:31 pm
" The Court cited the 1972 United States Supreme Court case of Barker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:07 am
EPA will rely upon the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” that was in place prior to 2015. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:45 am
The United States appeals, arguing the amount of the penalty is inadequate. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:11 am
by Jonathan Arogeti Those who dissented in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:11 am
While most of the attention regarding artificial intelligence and copyright has been centred in the United States, it’s useful to remember that one of the main pieces of litigation is taking place in the courts of England and Wales. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:36 am
Relying on its state constitution, the Iowa Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 11:03 am
North Dakota (2016), the United States Supreme Court held that state authorities may subject you to criminal penalties for refusing to take a breathalyzer test if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence (DUI). [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
In 1982, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
Elena Kagan is the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
United States, which the Chief Justice condemned in his own opinion. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
In the last blog entry, the Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy implications of the United States v. [read post]
