Search for: "United States v. Rice" Results 501 - 520 of 535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’ research project on… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
This article will examine how United States courts have dealt with this problem. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
  Even though the products were not sold in the United States, under the Fifth Circuit's decision in American Rice, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 4:13 pm
On Wednesday evening, CAAF will hear oral argument in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
May 25, 2006).On remand, the district court appointed Paul Rice, a law professor and the author of a leading attorney-client privilege treatise, to conduct the in camera review as a special master. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 2003 U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:25 am
Wayne Rice APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT Torts 'Seduction' Claims Against Rabbi Barred by State Law; Dissent Deems Fiduciary Duty Breach Claim Stated Marmelstein v. [read post]