Search for: "United States v. San Francisco"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,670
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 6:56 am
That case – the one that Facebook filed in Tax Court challenging the tax assessment – is set for a hearing at the Court’s August 21, 2019, San Francisco, California Special Trial Session. [read post]
15 May 2018, 2:26 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:48 am
Guest blogger: Norah Cunningham, law student, University of San Francisco “Hands-on-the-Hips” Arguments: Replacing Legal Reasoning with an Underlying Rhetoric of Fear and Criminalization In my Legal Research, Writing and Analysis class, my professor cautioned my class of fresh-faced 1Ls against... [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 663-671; Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:05 am
Linkedin, LinkedIn tried to analogize the case to United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:12 pm
For example, in Richmond Coal Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:45 am
" CJLF has also filed an amicus curiae brief in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:44 pm
The “foregone conclusion” doctrine was recently applied to the digital realm in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
The inaugural symposium, held in September in San Francisco, sold out with more than 450 attendees. **** SEC Matters SEC Published Examination Priorities for 2018. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
” The Court opined that the statutory exemption “endorsed the approach of the First District” in another CEQA “parking impacts” case, San Francisco Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 10:10 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:15 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco Cty., 137 S. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
United States, a securities-fraud case that they argue “represents yet another example of the overcriminalization that has run rampant throughout our legal system. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:25 am
San Francisco, is persuasive. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Yonahara, an editor of California Employment Law Letter can be reached at Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco, yonahara@freelandlaw.com. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Yonahara, an editor of California Employment Law Letter can be reached at Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco, yonahara@freelandlaw.com. [read post]
