Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 501 - 520 of 1,453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Andrew Hamm
He concludes that “Americans don’t agree on when the amendment was approved, and, I am sure, some in their hearts believe it should not bind the United States today. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Sharp a three-judge panel struck down a Delaware law requiring differential prevailing wages as violating the Commerce Clause. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 4 July 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by John Floyd
And what does this policy mean for asylum seekers who want to enter the United States? [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
United States: Whether to overrule the “separate sovereign” exception to the double jeopardy clause; Nieves v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
This ruling is not a surprise after Justice Samuel Alito’s sharp criticism of Abood in Knox v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 19 and 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
United States (Art Lein) The issue came to the Supreme Court in the case of Timothy Carpenter, who was convicted and sentenced to almost 116 years in prison for his role in a series of armed robberies in Ohio and Michigan. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]