Search for: "United States v. Union National Bank"
Results 501 - 520
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
If you care about the startup company ecosystem, I encourage you to give this question some thought and write the SEC. [1]Persons covered include (i) the issuer, (ii) any predecessor of the issuer; (iii) any affiliated issuer; (iv) any director, officer, general partner or managing member of the issuer; (v) any beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of the issuer’s equity securities; (vi) any promoter connect with the issuer in any capacity at the time of such sale; (vii) any… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
(ii) Is subject to any order, judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, entered within five years before such sale, that, at the time of such sale, restrains or enjoins such person from engaging or continuing to engage in any conduct or practice: (A) In connection with the purchase or sale of any security; (B) Involving the making of any false filing with the Commission; or (C) Arising out of the conduct of the business of an underwriter, broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer,… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Franck Abstract: The legitimacy of the World Bank's dispute resolution body - The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) - is a matter of heated debate. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Franck Abstract: The legitimacy of the World Bank's dispute resolution body - The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) - is a matter of heated debate. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:00 am
Union State Bank of Harvard, Neb., 281 U.S. 449 (1930), for the proposition that the original language of a treaty (and, presumably, a reservation made under a treaty) controls over the English translation. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
United Steel Union, 25 No. 19 Westlaw Journal Employment 4, Westlaw Journal Employment April 19, 2011The 3rd U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:46 am
Supreme Court Reverses California’s Discover Bank Rule And Holds Class Action Waivers Valid And Enforceable In Arbitration Agreements – from Class Action Defense Blog Class arbitration and unconscionability – from PointOfLaw Forum United States Supreme Court Decides Significant Arbitration And Class Action Case – from Labor Employment Law Blog Welcome Back, Arbitration? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
National Australia Bank - In June 2010 the Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
National Australia Bank, 130 S. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
National Australia Bank, 130 S. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:32 pm
The Constitution’s Framers recognized that Congress should enjoy the authority to “legislate in all Cases for the general interests of the Union, and also in those cases to which the States are separately incompetent, or in which the Harmony of the United States may be interrupted by the Exercise of individual legislation. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
In Union of India v. [read post]
