Search for: "Unknown Persons or Claimants" Results 501 - 520 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 2:27 am by Thomas Margoni
Fortunately, on appeal the court returned to reason and established that the person who claims the violation of his rights, bears the burden to identify specifically (indicating the relative URLs) the infringing content. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:40 pm by Tessa Shepperson
  It was not possible to claim against the tenant as she had ‘done a flit’ and her whereabouts were unknown. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:01 pm by Matthew Nied
However the website operator can, where appropriate, tell the user what is going on and to offer to pass on in writing to the claimant and the court any worthwhile reason the user wants to put forward for not having his or her identity disclosed. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the article says that the based on the awards the law firm could “pocket more than $25 million,” with Thomas himself “personally reaping a significant slice of that. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Most of these actions have been resolved, save only one proceeding remaining in the Bahamas where the claimants seek to recover $100 million. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 8:59 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
When a veteran is hurt in an accident (due to a car accident, a fall, or a defective product, for example), and he or she successfully pursues a claim against a responsible person or entity, the VA has a right to reimbursement from the veteran for the fair value of medical care that it provided to treat his injuries from the accident. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Himmelreich 15-109Issue: Whether a final judgment in an action brought under Section 1346(b) dismissing the claim on the ground that relief is precluded by one of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s exceptions to liability, 28 U.S.C. 2680, bars a subsequent action by the claimant against the federal employees whose acts gave rise to the FTCA claim. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
§ 922(g)(9), prohibiting gun possession by persons convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  The first, was in the case of Ting Lan Hong v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 2995 (QB) – on which we have already commented. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:21 am by velvel
All I can say for sure is that SIPC’s answers say it disallowed 8,489 claims of “claimants who had no account at Madoff,” and an additional 2,094 claims (or a total of 10,583) are tentatively in this category, but conceivably could be recategorized. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
It remained open to the other two claimants, or other companies in the Dyson Group, to revise their claims, as the programme’s meaning in relation to their claims had not yet been decided. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
The ICO said the app was downloaded onto the work phones of 1,015 staff members and it was “highly likely” it captured “a large variety of personal data,” the processing of which the ICO determined was “unfair and unlawful. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
” The toolkit is said to provide “a clear methodology to audit AI applications and ensure they process personal data fairly. [read post]
  He affirmed the position taken in New Zealand and Australia that ‘refugee status cannot be denied by requiring of the claimant that he or she avoid being persecuted by forfeiting a fundamental human right’ (emphasis added).[15] But rather than examine human rights treaties to identify the actual nature and scope of the right that would be denied, he simply invented his own – ‘the right to live openly without fear of persecution which the Convention exists to… [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:08 am
Complainant Person who seeks to initiate court proceedings against another person. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 1:21 pm
Complainant Person who seeks to initiate court proceedings against another person. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
"22 The Act was not intended to apply to errors and omissions coverage written on a "claims made" basis for persons such as design professionals.The first part also addresses an insurer’s duty to defend a construction professional against a property owner’s notice of claim served under CDARA. [read post]
5 May 2022, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In these circumstances, except in the most-clear cut cases, it may be harder for claimants to successfully prosecute claims. [read post]