Search for: "VIRGINIA v. U. S"
Results 501 - 520
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
District Judge Virginia Phillips of Riverside, Calif., had concluded last year. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Bank of China Ltd.: In Keren Elmaliach v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Bank of China Ltd.: In Keren Elmaliach v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm
Last September, however, a federal judge in Riverside, Calif., District Judge Virginia Phillips, struck down the ban; in October, she imposed a worldwide order barring continued enforcement. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
Von Moltke,332 18 U. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; Janice K. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court ruled in CSX Transportation v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Bayer Corp., 564 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm
S. ___, ___, or who “become[s] a party by intervention, substitution, or third-party practice,” Karcher v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm
Wainwright, 477 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:34 pm
Sebelius and Liberty U. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 665 S.E.2d 315, 2008.) 113 W. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:44 pm
Cacheris for leaving out of earlier briefing what its new brief called “the salient and binding precedent” — the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
The U.S. brief was filed in nearly identical form in the two cases; one of those can be read here; Virginia’s supplemental filing is here, and Liberty University’s is here. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:11 pm
Sebelius and Liberty U. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:14 pm
Sebelius and Liberty U. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:52 pm
Most observers readily state that the makeup of the panel has significant effect on the outcome.A rocky time for Liberty U.The matter of Liberty U. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:10 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
