Search for: "Vermont Department of Justice" Results 501 - 520 of 689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm by Betsy McKenzie
(here is a link for their investigation, "Betting on Justice: Borrowing to Sue. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:09 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Vermont Law Review has published an article authored by me and my Damon Key colleagues (and fellow law bloggers) Mark M. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:24 am by admin
The Leahy bill would give the Justice Department new powers to seek a U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:50 am by SHG
© 2010 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by On the Net
Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, Rhode Island and Washington have removed state-level criminal penalties for the medical use and cultivation of marijuana. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 12:33 pm by David Kravets
If not, the Justice Department could serve the court order at the registry for the site’s top-level domain. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:29 am
Justice Department to stay a ruling that temporarily blocks funding for human embryonic stem cell research"  [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 10:06 pm by Rich Cassidy
The Justice Department reported in 1984 that “nearly two? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:21 pm
The Department of Justice, the FTC, and 34 states–led by Vermont, California, and Florida—had filed briefs with the court, calling for en banc review. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:25 am by Victoria Pynchon
Department of Justice, Torts Branch, in Washington, D.C., and as a law clerk to the Honorable Barrington D. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
   The Purpose of Background Checks Employers have a number of legitimate reasons for conducting background checks: --Ensure that applicant is really qualified for the job (It is widely accepted that more than 50% of job applicants lie on their resumes) --Protect employees and others from being the victims of violent criminal activity (according to the Department of Justice, 1 out of every 32 adults has a criminal record) --Mitigate the risk of employee fraud and theft… [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm by Mark Murakami
  We were recently asked to submit an essay to the Vermont Law Review analyzing the property rights impacts of the decision. [read post]
The Court concluded that the Florida Supreme Court's decision didn't, but four justices set out their theory of judicial takings, two justices argued these situations should be analyzed as substantive due process questions, and two justices concluded "not now, but maybe later. [read post]