Search for: "Virginia v. West Virginia" Results 501 - 520 of 2,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2024, 1:15 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
Supreme Court involve the injunction applicable to the states of Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, and West Virginia in the lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Kentucky and the injunction applicable to the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, and Idaho in the lawsuit filed in the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:18 am
Allen Mendenhall, Auburn University, Temple University, West Virginia University, & Furman University, has published Holmes and Dissent (forthcoming in the Journal Jurisprudence). [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:06 pm
"    Just how bad were things in West Virginia? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:32 am by Lyle Denniston
The request for a stay by West Virginia officials had been filed with Chief Justice John G. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 9:51 am
On Wednesday the US Court of Appeals 4th District ruled against a West Virginia coal company with a yearly capacity of one million tons in Sewell Coal Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:55 am
A late attempt to reinforce a claim that the chief justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court is not biased failed on Friday when the Supreme Court denied permission to file a new brief on the issue. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:31 am by Cara Horowitz
Dan already has a good post up on the basics of the Supreme Court’s ruling today in the climate case West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 3:08 pm
Dey, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:23 pm
AT&T properly removed a class action lawsuit filed in West Virginia over automoatic "Roadside Assistance" charges under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), the Fourth Circuit held yesterday in Strawn v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
  Because no West Virginia court has ever “expressly or implicitly” addressed comment k, slip op. at 15, it had to predict an expansion of West Virginia law that is completely unsupported by state-court precedent. [read post]