Search for: "WILLING v. U S"
Results 501 - 520
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Let’s, you know, let’s try to work it out. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Lee, 579 U. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
Valuing a firm’s interest in contingency-fee cases has spawned years of dispute in Capizzi v Brown Chiari (discussed here). [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
U. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:01 pm
Beyer is cited in the following case: Weed v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence V. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
" Enbridge, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Morton-Bentley, Rhode Island’s School Funding Challenges in Historical Context, 24 Roger Williams U. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
U. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 12:18 pm
Collection Development, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:44 pm
Now teenagers perceive the Pickwick logo as trendy and are willing to pay extra for clothes bearing its trademark. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Federal Election Comm’n, 558 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
Mills, 595 U. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm
" in "Texte u. [read post]
