Search for: "Wait v. Second Judicial District Court" Results 501 - 520 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
The concurrence argued that such an instruction could be drafted without making a judicial comment on the evidence, and that an instruction is past due. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:54 pm by Eric
The guidelines are very similar to Colorado's Tattered Cover balancing test (Tattered Cover v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
When I’d blogged about the 8th District’s decision, and about the oral argument before the Supreme Court, I’d indicated that this position was doomed by the US Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in US v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:55 am by Russ Bensing
  That may have happened last week in the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
  But the year after the Supreme Court decided Riegel, it decided Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm by Randy Barnett
[I stressed that this was what President Jackson did when he vetoed the renewal of the second national bank after the Court had upheld it as constitutional in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  (Read here, here and here my prior posts on the subject.)Second, in New York as in most if not all other states, the rules governing venue in applications for judicial dissolution of corporations (Business Corporation Law 1112) and limited liability companies (LLC Law 702) specifically require the proceeding to be brought in the "judicial district" -- for the moment, think county -- "in which the office of the… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:31 am by Stefanie Levine
Second, if the evidence is later submitted to the district court in a §145 proceeding, that disclosure may cure any earlier acts of witholding. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:31 am by Stefanie Levine
Second, if the evidence is later submitted to the district court in a §145 proceeding, that disclosure may cure any earlier acts of witholding. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am by Jeff Gamso
On the constitutional question of whether the flat fee violated an indigent client‘s right to counsel, the district court, citing United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am by Jeff Gamso
On the constitutional question of whether the flat fee violated an indigent client‘s right to counsel, the district court, citing United States v. [read post]