Search for: "Wal-Mart Inc. Stores"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2013, 3:07 pm
The case presents multiple take-aways, including the viability of re-booted certification theories pursued by plaintiffs’ class action attorneys in the post-Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:39 am
Charles and Tammy Palmer are the plaintiffs in this suit after the two purchased a cantaloupe at the Wal-Mart store in Colorado Springs in August. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
Wal-Mart moved to dismiss the claims as time-barred. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:26 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-3798 (8th Cir. 2009) is noteworthy, since it illustrates how to state a claim for relief, that will at least survive a motion to dismiss the case, when a 401(k) plan's fiduciary is alleged to have breached its fiduciary duty by causing the plan to have excessive fees. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
Starkman Chicago Partner Paul Starkman provided his thoughts in an April 4 Business Insurance article, “Supreme Court expected to overturn Wal-Mart ruling” on a recent 9th Circuit appeals court decision that approved a massive class action lawsuit alleging gender discrimination by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 5:03 pm
Wal-Mart. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:38 am
Wal-Mart selling digital music free of copy curbs — pdf Wal-Mart said it would sell the “DRM-free” MP3 downloads of music by artists like the Rolling Stones, Amy Winehouse and Maroon 5 for 94 cents per track or $9.22 per album. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 11:32 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. also began contacting outlets last night and instructing them to withdraw cantaloupe grown in southwestern Indiana as a precaution, Dianna Ghee, a spokeswoman for the retailer, said in an interview today. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:08 pm
The lawsuit got the stamp of approval from a panel of federal appeals court judges yesterday: SAN FRANCISCO - Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the nation's biggest private employer, lost a bid to have an appeals court reconsider its decision to allow 2 million current and former female workers to sue as a group with sex-bias claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
The Supreme Court makes no substantive analysis of the opinion but merely directed that it be remanded back to the Ninth Circuit "for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
It usually doesn't change much from year to year.Now think of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., also known simply as Walmart.It's been the:Destroyer of Main Street America.Big box store every NIMBY loves to hateRetailer with two million workers without union cardsBiggest recipient of corporate welfareMost efficient supply chain for goods originating from ChinaGreen builder of enviro-friendly storesBetter source of fruits and vegetable than Whole FoodsAnd… [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Kerri Stone The Hazards of Dukes: The Substantive Consequences of a Procedural Decision, by Natalie Bucciarelli Pedersen—aside from having quite possibly the best title of any article, ever—is an important and informative reminder that one of the most newsworthy and talked about cases of the past decade, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Skeptics: The massive class action against retail giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc. ran into stiff resistance at the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:09 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
A leading feature of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the exception was applied when a man was bitten by a rattlesnake in a Wal-Mart garden center. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the exception was applied when a man was bitten by a rattlesnake in a Wal-Mart garden center. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:17 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Plaintiff, William Berrington filed suit alleging that Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
