Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
With its international platform and offices in the United States, United Kingdom, China, and Australia, Seyfarth Shaw’s experienced team of lawyers assists companies with large multi-jurisdictional employment law projects of a strategic, compliance and transactional nature, including issues involving noncompetes and trade secrets. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
With its international platform and offices in the United States, United Kingdom, China, and Australia, Seyfarth Shaw’s experienced team of lawyers assists companies with large multi-jurisdictional employment law projects of a strategic, compliance and transactional nature, including issues involving noncompetes and trade secrets. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
Frost Products Ltd v F C Frost Ltd  [2013] EWPCC 34 (Patents County Court, England and Wales) is a decision of Mr Justice Vos from 26 July 2013. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Abigail Slater
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
 By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart in the Western District of Washington is the world's pioneer in FRAND rate-setting decisions, but cases presenting similar challenges are pending in other jurisdictions, including Germany and the United Kingdom. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
He was wanted by officials in the United Arab Emirates for a string of dodgy deals in Dubai. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
It also examines the extent to which policy transfer is evident in the UK and Ireland in terms of emulating the United States in reacting to organised crime. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
United States: A Haitian-American journalist has been ordered to never again publish anything about the prime minister of Haiti [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Strong, currently a Fellow of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2012-13 term, is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and Senior Fellow at the award-winning Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, having previously taught law at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]