Search for: "Warne v. USA" Results 501 - 520 of 751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
” Sky News, GB News and USA Today cover the ruling. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Staff at the Telegraph have been warned in the official policy that using ChatGPT will result in the same sanctions as plagiarism, according to the Press Gazette. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm by Law Lady
(Reglan) Generic Drugs: FEDERAL LAW DOESN'T PREEMPT FAILURE-TO-WARN CLAIMS, Mensing v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX descriptive for… [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Ben
 The late playwright's son sued del Toro, the Fox Searchlight studio and others in February and Zindel v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:15 am by Shahid Buttar
EFF cited that decision 55 years later, when we filed First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
 Those Turtles and the issue of pre-1972 copyrights in sound recordings in the USA keep going on and on - with the Ninth Circuit appeals court now asking the lower court in California to consider what the Music Modernization Act (MMA) means for any ongoing disputes involving unpaid digital royalties on pre-1972 recordings. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm by Joy Waltemath
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. dba G4S Regulated Security Solutions, D. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Around 100 editors signed the request, warning that use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act puts journalists’ sources at risk. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The judgment directly concerns the legality of standard contractual clauses in the context of transfers of personal data to the USA. [read post]