Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 6:32 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Mark Wolf at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Elizabeth LaForgia of JURIST (who also covers the other oral arguments yesterday), and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
Robert Barnes writes, "Killer Frank Spisak, not his attorney, brought on death penalty, justices rule," for today's Washington Post. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post considers the use of dictionaries by the Justices in the context of a new study arguing that the Justices “brandish definitions as a way to dress up their subjective decisions with an ‘objective veneer. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:49 pm
From a NYT account of Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
Howard Wasserman previewed the case for us, with other coverage coming from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post (who focuses on the plaintiff in the case), Victor Li of the ABA Journal, and Mark Denton and Reymond Yammine for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
I reported on the oral argument for this blog; other coverage comes from Robert Barnes of The Washington Post (who focuses in particular on the Justices’ “New York state of mind” and Justice Breyer’s apparent confusion of Iowa and Illinois in the argument), Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes explains the rhetorical power of Lochner v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
Additional coverage of NIFLA, which will be argued tomorrow, comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Andrew Chung at Reuters. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
Wade and oppose Texas abortion law, Post-ABC poll finds (Scott Clement, William Bishop, & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) In Light of Tandon and Fulton, Do Exemptions to Anti-Discrimination Laws Undermine The Government’s Compelling Interest To Burden The Free Exercise of Religion? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:31 am
(Neelam Bohra, The Texas Tribune) Supreme Court takes the bench after long absence, but things have changed (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) The post The morning read for Tuesday, Oct. 5 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
[Robert Barnes/Washington Post, Julie Goldscheid/SCOTUSBlog, Michael Greve on oral argument in Mach Mining v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
David Goodman & Sabrina Tavernise, The New York Times) Supreme Court refuses to block Texas law banning abortions at six weeks (Robert Barnes, Ann Marimow, Emily Wax-Thibodeaux & Caroline Kitchener, The Washington Post) The Supreme Court Overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
Briefly: Following up on Wednesday’s oral argument in Lozano v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
” In Beckles v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:32 pm
" Also in the Washington Post is Bob Barnes and David Nakamura's report on today's filing, here. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
The Washington Post's Robert Barnes has this news analysis on the decision and what it portends for the Roberts Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:26 pm
In the Washington Post, Bill Miller and Robert Barnes have this article; Cary O'Reilly of Bloomberg News reports here; and the ACS Blog has this post on the District Court's ruling in this case. [read post]
