Search for: "Washington v. Government of District of Columbia" Results 501 - 520 of 1,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm by Jane Chong
This month, two more complaints were filed by the attorneys general of Washington D.C. and Maryland and 196 congressional Democrats, in federal district courts in Maryland and the District of Columbia, respectively. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Jim Martin
Jeremy Kessler, of Columbia University, provided four examples from the war period where the government promoted civil liberties and rights. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
Ginsburg’s opinion sides with federal district court review, rejecting the government’s argument that mixed claims be split between a district court and the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:05 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Trump, U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y., Jan. 23, 2017, https://s3.amazonaws.com/storage.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/23140054/CREW-DJT-Final.pdf and District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
The two amicus briefs were filed by 17 attorneys general, including New York, Virginia, Maryland, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am by Matthew Kahn
Those replacements will serve in Alabama, the District of Columbia, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm by Matthew Kahn
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
Further, the Ethics in Government Act allowed removals to be reviewed by the District Court for the District of Columbia, wherein reinstatement was considered appropriate relief. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm by Andrew Hamm
Attorney for the District of Columbia, characterized the Warren court as “absolutely path-breaking in terms of its expansion of rights, although subsequent courts have narrowed the scope of the ruling. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am by Rachel Bercovitz
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
Dorsen: I made that arrangement with the firm Wallace King, which Sedgwick absorbed as its Washington office. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:08 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this preview ran on August 8, 2016, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Bruce Markell discusses Czyzewski v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
Daniels, the Supreme Court of Washington struck down legislation that allowed one local government to annex territory from a contiguous local government. [read post]