Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court"
Results 501 - 520
of 891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Superior Court 210 Cal.App.4th 1006. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
<> Munce's Superior Petroleum Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Monterey Peninsula Water Dist. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Jou v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 1:17 pm
Jewell (federal reserved water rights, Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act) on 11/04/13. * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Wyandotte Nation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 3:12 pm
Irwindale v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
Superior Court, Supreme Ct. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
She also cited the 1917 Ontario Court of Appeal judgment of Campbell v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
” (Kim v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm
Superior Court 210 Cal.App.4th 1006. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:26 am
The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Tribe) petitioned for review in superior court, challenging the validity of Ecology’s amended rule reserving the water. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
Superior Court (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 889. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 3:15 pm
The case will now return to the Superior Court for a new trial. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:56 am
Either the California Supreme Court will hold, as many practitioners believe is appropriate, that Koontz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:31 am
Superior Court of Fresno County (Selma II) case out of the Fifth District Court of Appeal filed on April 26, 2012. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
”14 In 1942, the Supreme Court of Iowa explained: [P]roperty . . . is applied with many different meanings. [read post]
