Search for: "Webster v. Webster"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
Webster v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:44 pm
" Webster's New World College Dictionary 1187 (4th ed 2001). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
Additional Resources: Webster v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
Attorney General William Wirt and Daniel Webster argued for Gibbons. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:52 am
The case is State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:36 am
The Conflict Case In 2011, in Davis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 11:59 am
Webster v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s recent Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 4:41 pm
Town of Webster, 131 Misc. 2d 817 (Monroe Co. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
Another dictionary defines “misappropriate” alternatively as “to put to a wrong use” or “to apply wrongfully or dishonestly, as funds entrusted to one’s care” (Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary [3d ed 1999] [emphasis added]). [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:10 am
Citing Webster’s dictionary, the Court held that he could “set bounds or limit” the child’s country of residence by virtue of the right he was given under Chilean law, thus giving him right to “determine” that place of residence. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
In September, federal court justice Jacqueline Gleeson ordered the payout to Anne Webster MP over Facebook posts in April 2020 by Australian conspiracy theorist Karen Brewer. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The case at issue – Moore v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 am
Last week, in Comr. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:41 pm
For one thing, Roe v. [read post]
