Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
The Highway 68 Coalition v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
The Highway 68 Coalition v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 7:02 am
The supervisor did in fact grant the employee benefits as he sexually harassed her, granting her more working hours than other part-time employees were entitled to as well as permitting her to take advanced training. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:37 am
In Fitzemons v California Emergency Physicans Med. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
The district court applied a three-level sentencing enhancement for his managerial or supervisor role in the drug conspiracy. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:41 am
Informed by Interleasing Inc. v Ontario (Minister of Finance), [2009] O.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Nassar complained several times to Levine’s supervisor, Dr. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB) held in the case of Williams v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:42 am
The fact that the supervisor gave his own interpretation to the data really shouldn't matter (and I think five justices in Williams v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:27 pm
Then again, what's this got to do with Watters v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:56 am
In Fortune v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
Well, what are you going to do? [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 12:59 pm
Burgess v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
Any drop in performance evaluations will be examined, as well as the testimony of co-workers and as well as supervisors and managers. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:39 am
Well... not fight, but ya know, "fight. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 8:35 am
Because there was “no evidence whatever of causality,” summary judgment was affirmed on the retaliation claim as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Bailey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Bailey v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:56 am
A federal court in North Carolina also dismissed his negligent retention and supervision claims against the employer, as well as his Title VII claim against the head chef individually (Watkins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:14 am
From Essick v. [read post]