Search for: "Wells v. Thomas" Results 501 - 520 of 7,442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 9:31 pm by Patent Docs
By Kwame Mensah -- A free-flowing panel discussing the potential impact of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
We asked Greg Ablavsky to comment on that dissent [Part II will be later today]: What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part I—the Indian Commerce Clause Just in time for the end of Native American Heritage Month, Justice Thomas has written a dissent from the Court’s denial of certoriari in Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
"  The only reason we don't (e.g., Arizona doesn't) is because we know full well how that will affect the votes on the merits. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Liah Caravalho
Shaffer will interview Paulette Brown, president of the American Bar Association, about her distinguished legal career as well as the significance of Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Providing employees with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out work related activities Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04280, Appellate Division, First Department [See, also, Sagal-Cotler v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 04281, Appellate Division, First Department] The genesis of the Thomas action: An individual… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
Providing employees with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out work related activities Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04280, Appellate Division, First Department [See, also, Sagal-Cotler v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 04281, Appellate Division, First Department] The genesis of the Thomas action: An individual… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
Testimony by the appointing authority in a disciplinary actionDiMattina v LaBua, 262 AD2d 409One of the issues considered by the Appellate Division in the DiMattina case appeal concerned the fact that the appointing authority both preferred the charges filed against Thomas J. [read post]